You are viewing yarinaosu

Tue, May. 30th, 2006, 01:54 am
Is sex necessary?

The answer is, no.

But more to the point:

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2627&ncid=2627&e=8&u=/space/20060529/sc_space/studysexualdesireisinyourgenes

Freud was wrong. Go figure. Oh wait, anyone with a clue would have known that.

The stupid fucker. He just gave generations of idiots an excuse not to have any rules. Fuck Freud. He wanted to suck on that brown cock all day, he should do that without forcing others to join in his stupidity.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/05/12/notes051206.DTL

Idiots like the guy who wrote the article above think that sex is part of a person's life, and if they don't have "good sex" then they are missing out. Wtf. Its like saying that a poor starving african child's life is worthless because he doesn't have a hybrid car and a nice townhouse in San Fransico like the smug little fucker who wrote the article.

Sex is pointless. Those who pursue sex are a bunch of idiots that need to have their heads bashed in. Life is about doing something. Sex is not doing something. You want to procreate? Well, you definately don't need to worry about sex to do that. Theres a big difference from doing something for a child and doing something for pleasure.

No, your body should have no respect! Its there to be controlled. Lets follow the fucking Buddhist example of mastering the body instead of living in a fucked up hedonistic society that teaches people to be fat disgusting pigs while also requiring them to fuck as much as possible. Those fucked up "journalists" are the ones responsible for so many girls being depressed and having eating disorders. They tell the kids to have no discipline and do whatever they want, but doing whatever you want makes you physically unable to do whatever you want after a while. The body is not ment for gluttony or lust. You become numb to it all.

Sex, food, and indulgence is a drug. Don't take the damn drug, or at least shoot yourself because you are so fucking worthless that you can't contribute to society.

You people should be ashamed.

Tue, May. 30th, 2006 04:58 pm (UTC)
valeria_15

Society does focus alot on sex. You see it everywhere after 10pm in my country; people even have sex in the nightclubs around here (of course those are the strange underground clubs) And since we're on the internet, you're going to find it everywhere. It is a driving force; it no longer is the 'I want to find my mate to pro-create' but rather a more 'spread the seed' everywhere! kind of spiel.

Tue, May. 30th, 2006 06:33 pm (UTC)
yarinaosu

Its kinda disgusting and against natural selection. We are given the ability communicate to distinguish from our mates which genes should be passed on. So, genetically speaking, they are doing more harm than good.

Hell, they are doing no good. The family system was created in order to raise the best children in the best way. It expanded to society, having the family and society raising children to help them work together and be intellectual. Sex or having sex outside of procreation, goes against society itself and goes against human nature. Hell, it goes against genetics itself.

Few animals have sex before they are even able to take care of their children, and those that do have sex with as many partners as they can still only have sex when they are ready to mate.

Tue, May. 30th, 2006 07:02 pm (UTC)
valeria_15

nope sorry, that's not going to happen, especially the way society is now.
It's TOO boring if people want to go in the direction of a monotonous relationship - family values and all that. That's ancient history to them and frankly, the allure of everything that is against nature and genetics is deadly charming. You should know this; you're very well versed in the bible and literature. What do you think the writers in the bible have been chanting about? What do you suppose Chaucer and Dante Allighieri, Thomas Moore, even Shakespeare's 'morality plays' for god's sake, as well as Plato, Aristotle, etc talk about? They're all different, but the messages are always very very clear: the awareness of a virtuous life.

It doesn't matter because they can preach and write it to high heaven, and frankly, it goes over some, I mean *many* people's heads. It doesn't have to be about being a 'believer'of a religion, it's really about a believer in your moral and clean life. Being clean is too boring to some.

Alot of animals in the wild actually have much proper 'sexual'drives, and more 'orderly' approaches than humans. I was thinking about how the male wild antelopes fight to proclaim to be the leader of the pack; therefore they get to screw or choose their mate. (it's actually a natural selection) but really, the sad part of that is that the winner has to stand alone in the desert plains to be the look out. (oftentimes, they are handpicked by lions), but it is the way of their methods. And you're right, even the ones who have tons of sexual drives only do so to pro create. Human beings are superior to that though, *supposedly*

Tue, May. 30th, 2006 07:03 pm (UTC)
valeria_15

I meant *monogomous* relationship above *roll eyes*

Tue, May. 30th, 2006 09:03 pm (UTC)
yarinaosu

I say we need to start beating people who have sex. Lets start with the underaged people. There are too many punk kids these days, and any of them caught having sex should be beaten bloody then throw into jail to be raped. That will teach them that underaged sex isn't cool.

And no, I'm not really joking. I'm just that cruel when it comes to stupid people.

Tue, May. 30th, 2006 09:46 pm (UTC)
valeria_15

I'm sure you're adamant on that and you'd be a cruel, harsh, strict judge. Kids /underaged group have actually areas in their brains that haven't fully developed. They're 'growing', so there's bound to be mistakes made, and lots of stupidity thrown around (not to say that adults dont do stupid stuff - they do, it's just more understandable with kids. but despite what kids do, hormones or not; if they're not given love and support, understanding in the moral direction in the home - then there's your problem. Also, other kids who dont have that support at home go to school and then become bullies, or those who get picked on, then you have the kids who want to 'fit in', be a freaking hero, be someone cool, and there you have it.

Always starts at the home, and frankly, that's alot of growing kids you're talking about. Parents dont remain at home because they're too busy with career and building money and equity, and a future. Blahblahblah....blahblah...it's a spiral.

Tue, May. 30th, 2006 11:39 pm (UTC)
yarinaosu

Children are developed. Its just a load of social bs that people claim that makes them feel otherwise. Jerks like Freud used psychology to make claims that were just not true about what was "standard" for humans, so instead of dealing with their problems, they used excuses.

Children can be disciplined. They just aren't. Thats pathetic and 99.9% of kids are ruined by age five, because of shitty parenting.

Wed, May. 31st, 2006 02:45 am (UTC)
trypanophobic34

I hope I'm not a "ruined" child.

Wed, May. 31st, 2006 03:02 am (UTC)
yarinaosu

Do you think that discipline is necessary? Do you think that you are capable of improving? Do you work hard to improve? Do you strive to be the best possible, not the "best you can be" bs?

If no, then you were ruined.

Mon, Jun. 5th, 2006 03:54 am (UTC)
luper

While I agree we shouldn't base our lives on sex, but I don't like your whole view of virginity. Your looking at a girl as if she is an object and she's worth nothing if she doesn't have her virginity. What happened to personality and her happiness?
I could be wrong, but it seems you view girls more as things to hunt and gain then real human beings.

Mon, Jun. 5th, 2006 02:20 pm (UTC)
yarinaosu

Thats like saying I look at murderers as objects who lost their worth the moment they murdered.

Sex is the physical body. You can't have a physical body. The body is not there to dominate you, but to be overcome.

Buddhism, Shintoism, Daoism, Christianity, Judiasm and many other religions agree on this point.

Sex is objectifying yourself, and those who become objects are worthless. Its just that simple. People who have sex aren't real humans. They are worthless animals.

Mon, Jun. 5th, 2006 10:38 pm (UTC)
luper

So, to hug some one is to objectify yourself?

Tue, Jun. 6th, 2006 01:17 am (UTC)
yarinaosu

According to Buddhist principles, it is.

Tue, Jun. 6th, 2006 04:09 am (UTC)
luper

Then don't hug/cuddle other people if you believe sex is bad.

Tue, Jun. 6th, 2006 05:32 am (UTC)
yarinaosu

You can hug without having sex. Jesus "embraced" his fellow man as a greeting but did not have sex with them. You can hug your father or your mother and not have sex with them.

Sat, Jun. 17th, 2006 09:40 am (UTC)
octi_stripe

Hi. I found your journal through the anthropologist site, and while I agree that pointless lust and people who just want a piece of ass are retarded, I have to disagree with your hatred for sex. You haven't experienced what it can do for your being to be cared for and responded to in such a personal and physical way. If you are young, than it makes sense. Kids having sex is fucked because they aren't mature enough to understand what sex really is and should be. The body isn't there to be overcome, it is to be honored and integrated with the mind. Without your body, you do not exist, and sex is the most intense use of your body, and it can change your mind for the better.

Those religions said those things because unrestrained reproduction is a social evil. Have safe sex that with someone who cares and understands and become a human.

Sat, Jun. 17th, 2006 06:59 pm (UTC)
yarinaosu

Sex does not equal anything to being human, nor is it anything beyond animalistic desires which control how people act.

Sex is not needed for a true relationship, and the greatest intellectual minds didn't need sex to truly have an understanding or relationship. Many of the greatest people int he world were chaste.

Sex and using the body is wrong. The body is not yours, and you are not supposed to do whatever you feel like. Emotions need to be denied, or you act like a rabid animal.

Hence, people get fat, have diseases, etc. Sex has always been the root of social collapse, and, as Gibbon says, the first sign of a failed government is sexual indulgence.

Sex is not love. Sex is the opposite of love. Sex is a physical act. Divine grace and intelligence are opposed to sex.

Sat, Jun. 17th, 2006 09:22 pm (UTC)
octi_stripe

Yeah. I guess I should have looked around here a bit more before commenting. We disagree on a very fundamental level about what makes someone a worthwhile human being and any argument is pointless. I'm actually pleasantly surprised that there is some level, small as it is, where we can relate. Score one for humanity!

Hopefully, if we ever meet in real life, we won't have to go beyond basic small talk :)

Sun, Jun. 18th, 2006 12:44 am (UTC)
yarinaosu

Small talk is a waste of time. All that matters is enlightenment. Sex only keeps you from understanding truth in the world.

Wed, Jun. 14th, 2006 10:07 am (UTC)
lulzworth

Actually, as time goes on, a lot of the later-20th century anti-Freud revolution in psychology has worn off and we're seeing that a lot of this ideas are more accurate than we'd earlier suspected.

Wed, Jun. 14th, 2006 02:06 pm (UTC)
yarinaosu

Well, thats mostly in motivation towards subconscious action developed in childhood years, whereas, Freud's sexual writings when it comes to sex being more important than social customs, as shown above, is rather wrong. It turns out that society was a good thing.
(Screened comment)

Sun, Apr. 13th, 2008 11:49 pm (UTC)
yarinaosu

I'm sorry that you got herpes from being a stupid whore, but it doesn't mean that you can make fun of those who actually have respect for themselves.

Go kill yourself before you infect others, creep.

And Buddhists? I'm pretty sure that sex is part of that which is denied, since pleasure of all forms are prisons of the mortal world that keep people from enlightenment. Thanks for misunderstanding one of the major religions of the world, ass hole.
(Screened comment)

Mon, Apr. 14th, 2008 02:18 pm (UTC)
yarinaosu

Fundie? No. A fundamentalist is a Protestant. I'm not a Protestants. Hell, you don't even understand Buddhism, and you think you could understand the complexities of other religions? You are a hedonist. No major religious supports hedonism. You are just a sad fuck.

Mon, Apr. 14th, 2008 02:19 pm (UTC)
yarinaosu

And any group that needs to link to something from two years ago is absolutely retarded. You guys are so pathetic that you can't find something new to harass. Enjoy being screened.